सामग्री पर जाएं
गेम्स · समीक्षाएं · डेटाबेस
मंच

DyAc+ vs ULMB 2 – does the extra strobing actually help my flick shots in CS2?

होम › Forums › ई-स्पोर्ट्स हार्डवेयर, Latency & Audio › Competitive Audio, IEMs & Soundstages › DyAc+ vs ULMB 2 – does the extra strobing actually help my flick shots in CS2?

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #124645

    I’ve been running competitive CS2 on a 240 Hz IPS panel and I’ve been torn between the different motion-blur reduction modes. Right now I just have ULMB 2 on my ASUS, but I keep seeing pro configs using BenQ DyAc+ and I can’t tell if the difference is real or just hype. The problem is that when I crank up the strobing, the screen gets way too dark and I start losing track of enemies moving across open maps, but when I turn it off the moving targets look like a smear and my flicks feel sluggish.

    Has anyone actually tested these side by side? Specifically I’m wondering about the pulse width stuff people talk about, whether DyAc+ at 240 Hz is even usable for long sessions, and what overdrive setting plays nice with it. My current ULMB 2 setup feels great in Aim Trainer but I’m not sure if I’m leaving accuracy on the table by not moving to DyAc+.

    "[Case: FormD T1 9.95L] • [CPU: i7-14700K] • [GPU: RTX 4070 Ti Super]"
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Gamer24H में खोजें

कम से कम 3 अक्षर दर्ज करें।

अन्वेषण करें

दिखावट

अपना रंग थीम चुनें

स्वचालित mode follows your device and switches to Xbox, PlayStation, or Nintendo colors on matching stories. Your manual choice stays on this device.

🌍 भाषा चुनें 25 भाषाएं
🔍