Saltar al contenido
JUEGOS · ANÁLISIS · BASE DE DATOS
Foro

DyAc+ vs ULMB 2 – does the extra strobing actually help my flick shots in CS2?

Inicio › Forums › Esports Hardware, Latency & Audio › Competitive Audio, IEMs & Soundstages › DyAc+ vs ULMB 2 – does the extra strobing actually help my flick shots in CS2?

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #124645

    I’ve been running competitive CS2 on a 240 Hz IPS panel and I’ve been torn between the different motion-blur reduction modes. Right now I just have ULMB 2 on my ASUS, but I keep seeing pro configs using BenQ DyAc+ and I can’t tell if the difference is real or just hype. The problem is that when I crank up the strobing, the screen gets way too dark and I start losing track of enemies moving across open maps, but when I turn it off the moving targets look like a smear and my flicks feel sluggish.

    Has anyone actually tested these side by side? Specifically I’m wondering about the pulse width stuff people talk about, whether DyAc+ at 240 Hz is even usable for long sessions, and what overdrive setting plays nice with it. My current ULMB 2 setup feels great in Aim Trainer but I’m not sure if I’m leaving accuracy on the table by not moving to DyAc+.

    "[Case: FormD T1 9.95L] • [CPU: i7-14700K] • [GPU: RTX 4070 Ti Super]"
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Buscar en Gamer24H

Introduce al menos 3 caracteres.

Explorar

APARIENCIA

Elige tu tema de color

Automático mode follows your device and switches to Xbox, PlayStation, or Nintendo colors on matching stories. Your manual choice stays on this device.

🌍 SELECCIONAR IDIOMA 25 Idiomas
🔍