•Leaker known as Cyberleek has shut down the website used to share clips of upcoming bağlantı”>Grand Theft تلقائي 6, saying they will not release a full build of the game publicly or post further leaks. The leaker also denied that the operation was a cryptocurrency scam.
The site, which had been distributing gameplay footage ahead of the November launch, was updated on October 14 with a three-part message titled “End of the road,” according to bağlantı”>Cyberleek’s now-offline site. The leaker wrote that it was all over and said they would not share the game’s ending, though they claimed to have it.
“CL has the ending,” Cyberleek wrote. “It was considered. It would punish Take-Two greatly – but ruin the experience for the gamers, who did nothing wrong. Take-Two would show CL no mercy – why should CL show any to them? Still: Take-Two was punished enough. The ending stays unpublished. Proof: the latest leek – clips from the final missions, out of context, revealing nothing.”
Cyberleek warned that story spoilers remained and alleged that if someone were to “remove” their site it would trigger a dead man’s switch that would post the leaks online.
The leaker again claimed to hold a build of GTA 6 but said they would not upload it, citing an unmet cryptocurrency milestone. Because bağlantı”>their cryptocoin didn’t reach a value of $30 million, “no build” would be released.
“The 30M was not reached, so no build,” Cyberleek wrote. “Uploading 200+ GB anonymously is a serious risk – worth it only if the milestone funded the secret project. Terms honored as written.”
Despite widespread suggestions that the scheme resembled a rug pull designed to lure people for money, Cyberleek denied this and attacked critics who claimed they lacked access to the game or suspected a scam.
“CL sold twice. Both times: trading fees only, as always announced,” the leaker wrote. “The first sale caused a cascade: everyone else sold, and CL was blamed for the crowd’s dump. The chain is public: what CL holds, sold, and delivered. What was promised was kept. The token was always a donation, never an investment. No returns promised, none implied. Rugpull talk comes from people who never opened the chain. Mostly YouTubers. Do not trust them. They have no idea what they are talking about.”
“Sad, the negativity – and how few believe anything real is behind this,” Cyberleek posted. “CL was transparent about the token from day one: a donation, never an investment. It changed nothing – influencers decided the story before the facts arrived. | The Edict stands. The leeks stop here. For now. | — CYBERLEEK”
1 comment