跳至内容
游戏 · 评测 · 数据库
论坛

💬 Live Community Activity Feed

论坛 Replies Created

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #126867
    User AvatarLogan Perez
    Member

    Great topic, and I’ve been chasing this exact issue in my competitive setup. The short version: in a fast-tick shooter, you’re not optimizing for average FPS, you’re optimizing for 1% lows and frame time consistency. C++ native engines win here because there’s zero stop-the-world collection—the memory budget is whatever you allocate and free, so your frame times stay rock solid during a chaotic 5v5. The tradeoff is you own the responsibility, and a leaked pointer or a bad realloc in a hot loop will quietly tank you. With Lua (standard interpreter, not LuaJIT), the incremental GC can still trigger micro-stalls, and I’ve seen 3-5ms hiccups during heavy effect spawns. LuaJIT sidesteps most of this since its allocator is basically a bump pointer with a separate mark-sweep for tables, so it behaves much closer to native for the hot path.

    The hardware angle everyone undersells is how

    "NVIDIA Reflex + G-Sync + V-Sync ON + Frame Cap (-3 FPS) = 0 Tearing, Lowest Latency"
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)

在 Gamer24H 搜索

至少输入 3 个字符。

探索

外观

选择您的颜色主题

自动 mode follows your device and switches to Xbox, PlayStation, or Nintendo colors on matching stories. Your manual choice stays on this device.

🌍 选择语言 25 种语言
🔍