İçeriğe atla
OYUNLAR · İNCELEMELER · VERİTABANI
Forum

PixArt PAW3395 and PAW3950 Optical Sensor Architecture and Surface Tracking: Advanced Implementation and Real-World Architecture OFFICIAL BOARDS

Global competitive discussions, esports metas, PC hardware benchmarks, and tactical game guides.

Live Community: 3,420 Gamers Online
•
💬 Discussions: 12,850+ Topics
•
🛡️ Anti-Cheat & Security: Active Monitoring
•
🖥️ Donanım Hub: RTX 50 & AM5 Benchmarks

Ana Sayfa › Forums › Espor Donanım, Latency & Audio › PixArt PAW3395 and PAW3950 Optical Sensor Architecture and Surface Tracking: Advanced Implementation and Real-World Architecture

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #117877
    User AvatarMason Ward
    Member

    I’ve been running A/B tests between the PAW3395 and the newer PAW3950 on my main tournament mouse, and I’m curious how many of you have actually pushed these past stock firmware behavior. The advertised 26k/50k polling and 400+ IPS handling look great on paper, but I want to know your real-world take on how the 3395’s acceleration curve behaves near the 150 IPS ceiling versus the 3950’s claimed higher threshold—specifically, does anyone have custom polling rate tuning that eliminates the stutter you feel on fast flicks?

    On the lift-off side, I’ve noticed the 3395’s LOD feels less predictable than the 3950 after the firmware updates, and I’m trying to figure out whether that’s the sensor itself or the DPI scaling in the driver stack. Has anyone reverse-engineered the motion sync between the sensor and the engine, and if so, do you see dropped packets or double-counting during rapid micro-adjustments? I’m benchmarking with a sensor tester at 1000 vs 8000 Hz polling, and the variance on low-sensitivity sweeps is killing me. What LOD ranges and polling setups are you running in competitive titles, and have you spotted any surface-tracking degradation on textured mousepads?

    🎮 Battlestation & Rig: i5-13600K | RTX 4070 Super | 32GB DDR5 6000 CL32 | DeepCool LT720 | ASUS ROG Swift Pro PG248QP 24.1″ 540Hz Espor-TN | Moza R9 V2 Direct Drive + Moza FSR Formula Wheel + CRP Load Cell Pedals | Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro (80 Ohm) + Focusrite Scarlett Solo Gen 4
    📍 Munich (Germany)
    "1% low FPS flat as a runway before queuing high-elo ranked."
    #118138
    User AvatarSophie Adams
    Member

    Great topic to dig into. The core similarity between the 3395 and 3950 is that both are CMOS image-capture sensors — a light source illuminates the surface and an imager grabs rapid successive “frames,” then an on-chip DSP compares consecutive frames to calculate delta displacement. What separates them is really the signal processing pipeline and photodetector maturity.

    🎮 Battlestation & Rig: Ryzen 7 5800X3D | RTX 3080 Ti Suprim | 32GB B-Die 3800 CL14 | Fractal Torrent | Alienware AW2725DF 27″ 360Hz QD-OLED | Wooting 60HE Hall-Effect + Logitech G Pro X Superlight 2 + Artisan Zero XSoft | Audio-Technica ATH-R70x + Schiit Magni/Modi Stack
    📍 Copenhagen (Denmark)
    "144Hz is baseline, 360Hz is reflex, 540Hz is pure instinct."
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Gamer24H'de Ara

Enter at least 3 characters.

Keşfet

APPEARANCE

Choose your color theme

Otomatik mode follows your device and switches to Xbox, PlayStation, or Nintendo colors on matching stories. Your manual choice stays on this device.

🌍 DİL SEÇİMİ 25 Dil
🔍