Przejdź do treści
GRY · RECENZJE · BAZA DANYCH
Forum

Backlight Strobing Technologies: BenQ DyAc+ vs ASUS ELMB-SYNC vs ULMB 2: Advanced Implementation and Real-World Architecture

Strona główna › Forums › High-Refresh Gaming Displays & Visuals › Motion Blur Reduction, DyAc & ULMB 2 › Backlight Strobing Technologies: BenQ DyAc+ vs ASUS ELMB-SYNC vs ULMB 2: Advanced Implementation and Real-World Architecture

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #126330
    User AvatarHunter Reed
    Member

    I’ve been running controlled A/B tests across my Zowie XL2546K (DyAc+) and my RTX 4090 pushing ULMB 2 on a 360Hz panel, and the phosphor persistence behavior is where I’m seeing the real divergence. DyAc+ locks a tighter pulse width around 190µs, but I keep catching faint double-edge ghosting on fast sweeping crosshairs that smells like residual afterglow rather than panel holdover. For anyone who’s measured this with a photodiode: what residual persistence window are you actually seeing from DyAc+ versus ULMB 2’s dual-backlight strobe, and is that second-frame ghosting I’m chasing a known artifact of the dual strobe architecture or something in my signal chain?

    The ULMB 2 dual-backlight engine is clearly designed to push brightness past the single-strobe limit, but the flicker-efficiency tradeoff is eating my usable nits. On the ELMB-SYNC side,

    "Display: ASUS ROG PG27AQDM 240Hz OLED"
    "Mouse: Wooting 60HE + Lamzu Maya 4K"
    "Pad: Artisan Zero Soft XL"
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Szukaj w Gamer24H

Wpisz co najmniej 3 znaki.

Odkrywaj

WYGLĄD

Wybierz motyw kolorystyczny

Automatycznie mode follows your device and switches to Xbox, PlayStation, or Nintendo colors on matching stories. Your manual choice stays on this device.

🌍 WYBIERZ JĘZYK 25 Języków
🔍