Hold onto your controllers, folks, because Sony just dropped a patent application that’s equal parts fascinating and deeply unsettling. It details the possibility of using AI to play games for you, potentially fueled by your own gameplay data – and even allowing players to sell their data to train these AI “agents.” Is this the future of gaming, or a glimpse into a Black Mirror-esque dystopia?
The Rise of the AI Grinder
As first reported by Cheat Happens, Sony’s patent (filed in 2022 and officially published last month) outlines “a technology of generating an agent to play a game on behalf of a user.” While we saw a similar concept back in January with a patent for AI-controlled “ghost” players, this new application delves much deeper into the implications. This isn’t just about having an AI complete simple tasks; it’s about leveraging your own gameplay habits to create a personalized gaming experience – or, more accurately, avoidance of playing.
Unlike previous iterations that relied on pre-recorded footage for training, this patent proposes using the user’s actual gameplay data. Figure 11 illustrates how the AI could be programmed to perform specific tasks autonomously, such as “collect money,” “proceed story,” and even tackle “boss battles.” Imagine paying a subscription just to have an AI grind levels for you while you binge-watch Netflix.
Selling Your Gameplay: A New Low?
But here’s where things get truly bizarre. The patent explicitly mentions the possibility of players exchanging their training data with one another – and, crucially, receiving payment for it. The text states, “In a case where the user data […]of another user is used for generation of an agent of the user A, the game system 1 may construct a mechanism to receive a payment from the user A for use of the user data […].” This opens the door to a marketplace of gameplay data, where players could potentially sell their skills and expertise – or, more likely, their time – to others. For example, “In a case where the user A generates an agent by using the user data […]of a famous game player, the user A may be allowed to purchase the user data […]of the famous game player.”
So, let’s break this down. You buy a game, then you pay someone else to essentially be you in that game using an AI trained on the data of a “famous game player.” What’s the difference between that and just watching a playthrough on YouTube? Honestly, I’m struggling to see the appeal. Who is this even for? And why would Sony patent something so… ethically questionable?
Look, we all know gaming companies file patents constantly for everything from new control schemes to innovative gameplay mechanics. It doesn’t automatically mean they have any intention of actually implementing them. But even if Sony never officially releases AI player agents, the mere existence of this patent raises some serious questions about the future of gaming and the potential for third-party companies to exploit these ideas.
Comments
Be the first to comment.