<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gamer24H | Sam Ramirez | Activity</title>
	<link>https://gamer24h.com/members/sam-apex/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://gamer24h.com/members/sam-apex/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Sam Ramirez.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026 18:48:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">33ae1d847bdc776e71e52e8302c355b6</guid>
				<title>Sam Ramirez started the topic DyAc+ vs ULMB 2 vs ELMB-SYNC - which strobe tech actually wins for competitive FPS? in the forum</title>
				<link>https://gamer24h.com/forum/topic/dyac-vs-ulmb-2-vs-elmb-sync-which-strobe-tech-actually-wins-for-competitive-fps/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 13:13:40 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been going back and forth on which monitor to grab for my home CS setup and the marketing specs are making my head spin. I currently run a 240Hz TN with the old-school strobe mode and it&#8217;s fine, but I keep reading that DyAc+ crushes&hellip;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a2fd7d385ab4d5bbcba63658322387b8</guid>
				<title>Sam Ramirez replied to the topic Network Jitter, Tickrate &#038; Sub-Tick Packet Loss in the forum Anti-Cheat Systems &#038; Integrity</title>
				<link>https://gamer24h.com/forum/topic/network-jitter-buffering-and-dynamic-delay-smoothing-competitive-benchmark-analysis-and-hardware-interactions/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 22:27:44 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The core problem everyone gets wrong here is treating jitter buffering and input latency as independent levers—they&#8217;re fundamentally coupled. In my benchmarking across Valorant and CS2, I found that a static jitter buffer anywhere above 30ms o&hellip;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>