<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gamer24H | Ethan Gray | Activity</title>
	<link>https://gamer24h.com/members/boost-ethan-12/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://gamer24h.com/members/boost-ethan-12/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Ethan Gray.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2026 03:49:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4adf196fc95bf2e2d96f2f08f03d653d</guid>
				<title>Ethan Gray started the topic My 240Hz panel claims 0.5ms response time but everything&#039;s still blurry when I track targets? in the forum Motion Blur Reduction, DyAc &#038; ULMB 2</title>
				<link>https://gamer24h.com/forum/topic/my-240hz-panel-claims-0-5ms-response-time-but-everythings-still-blurry-when-i-track-targets/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2026 02:29:57 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Picked up a 240Hz TN monitor for CS and the spec sheet looks insane on paper &#8211; 0.5ms GTG, aggressive overdrive, all that good stuff. But when I&#8217;m tracking moving targets or doing quick flicks, there&#8217;s still a visible smear trailing&hellip;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">006eba7d0c7c5a121ef727606a690444</guid>
				<title>Ethan Gray started the topic Sensor Motion Sync Technology: Smoothing vs Instantaneous Latency Tradeoff: Competitive Benchmark Analysis and Hardware Interactions in the forum</title>
				<link>https://gamer24h.com/forum/topic/sensor-motion-sync-technology-smoothing-vs-instantaneous-latency-tradeoff-competitive-benchmark-analysis-and-hardware-interactions-2/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026 14:35:21 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been running controlled ADR tests comparing 1:1 sensor passthrough against motion-smoothing implementations, and the latency tradeoff at the USB polling layer is where I keep hitting a wall. When the sensor reports at 1000Hz but the host &hellip;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>